#Wirecast studio vs wirecast pro pro
#Wirecast studio vs wirecast pro software
#Wirecast studio vs wirecast pro free

While StreamYard supports Web Based deployment Wirecast is suitable for Web Based deployment. Comparison Between StreamYard and Wirecast In terms of Deployment Type The one which suits your business needs is the best. When you compare StreamYard vs Wirecast, look for scalability, customization, ease of use, customer support and other key factors. Wirecast is known for functionalities like Leads Capture, Conferencing & Remote Production, Controller and Unlimited Sources. StreamYard includes features like Multi Streaming, Branded Store App for customers, Guest Engagement and Recording. Let’s discover some of the essential factors that you must consider and decide whether StreamYard or Wirecast fits your business.Ĭomparison of StreamYard vs Wirecast In terms of Features Let’s have a detailed comparison of StreamYard vs Wirecast to find out which one is better. But when live streaming is a part of the master plan and can be budgeted for, Wirecast is the application you’ll want to look more into.A Quick Comparison Between StreamYard and Wirecast When you’re just trying to slap something together for the sake of seeing how it works, Flash Media Live Encoder does a great job. Often times live streaming can be an after thought with today’s technology. This is a good thing for those of us who have changing specific needs, but its overkill to the everyday church volunteer. While settings can be saved and recalled easily, FMLE offers quite a bit of control over your outgoing media.

Flash Media Live Encoder is designed for the technically inclined. Training volunteers on the various settings and controls has been quite easy. As long as your pipe to the net is big enough, Wirecast can push your content through no problem.Įven though Wirecast offers a ton more features, its extremely well designed. Wirecast has a much greater tolerance for average computers and handles resources in a more efficient way.

Often times the audio will lose sync with the video, or your video will take forever to buffer. Once FMLE has maxed out your computer’s resources strange things start happening to your feed. But hey, its FREE!įMLE is an extremely resource hungry application. While you do have the ability to push a stream and save to disk simultaneously, there aren’t many other great features. With Wirecast you have the option to fade between multiple camera angles, overlay text or graphics, and you can output to multiple bandwidths simultaneously.įlash Media Live Encoder is simply just an encoder.

#Wirecast studio vs wirecast pro software

It’s an actual video production switcher in software form. So what makes Wirecast so special to charge so much for something Adobe gives away for free? Wirecast is more than just a live encoder.

#Wirecast studio vs wirecast pro free

Wirecast does offer a somewhat striped down version of their streaming production software for $495, but that’s still quite a bit more than FMLE, which by the way is a free program offered by Adobe.

#Wirecast studio vs wirecast pro pro

Touting a hefty $995 for the Pro version of Wirecast this application is expensive compared to its rival.

Lets compare these applications across four factors:įor some the price tag between these two programs is enough to make a decision. In the live streaming world there are two applications that dominate this corner of the market: Adobe’s Flash Media Live Encoder and Telestream’s Wirecast. With so many churches looking to live stream their services, one important question always comes up.